Scholarly Communication’s mess: Can economic analysis help?
John M. Budd, School of Information Science and Learning Technologies
LIBRES Volume 22, Issue 1 (March 2012)
This paper constitutes a trial of a game- and decision-theory based approach that is intended to examine elements of the complexities of scholarly communication as an economic endeavor. Both individual and institutional kinds of games are analyzed in order to determine what factors would affect the real economic use of game and decision theories. There are interrelationships between the two kinds that add complexity to any possible application. Further, this analysis includes ideal and practical factors that affect real economic application. As is shown here, there are serious challenges to application of the theories, but also important indicators for the furtherance of individual and institutional interests by means of negotiation.
LIBRES Editorial Board for this issue:
Kerry Smith (Editor-in-Chief)
Curtin University, Western Australia
Heather Lea Moulaison (Research and Applications Editor)
Mary Beth Weber (Essays and Opinions Editor)
Rutgers University Libraries
Kerry Smith (News, Meetings Editor)
Rebecca Scriven (Web Manager)
Derek Silvester (Technical Manager)